The Guns & Ammo Network



Bloomberg: Cops Should Strike For Gun Control

Bombastic billionaire New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, whose agitation for restrictive gun control has taken a variety of paths, came up with a new one this week. The fabulously rich business information tycoon and antagonist of SGN advertiser Lauer Custom Weaponry suggested that police should go on strike to force legislators to restrict guns.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/hizzoner_striking_idea_for_police_OqzoiT1wjZqr4eTSN7zpzI#ixzz21YahoFmEs

“I don’t understand why police officers across this country don’t stand up collectively and say we’re going to go on strike, we’re not going to protect you unless you, the public, through your legislature, do what’s required to keep us safe,” he said on CNN.

“Police officers want to go home to their families. And we’re doing everything we can to make their job more difficult, but more importantly, more dangerous, by leaving guns in the hands of people who shouldn’t have them and letting people who have those guns buy things like armor piercing bullets.”

One can only imagine what Bloomberg would say if police threatened to strike against, say, the Miranda rule.

Interestingly, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, hardly a poster boy for gun ownership in the past, jumped on his neighbor:

“Can we at least get through the initial grief and tragedy for these families before we start making them political pawns? I am a little bit disturbed by the politicians who in the immediate aftermath of this type of tragedy try to grandstand on it, and I’m not going to be one of those people.”

  • Archie

    Bet anyone a C-note that bastard has someone with a firearm protecting his sorry arse right this minute. Bloomberg is an insane moron leading an insane city in an insane state. I'd compare the crime rate in Phoenix (open carry) with NYC any day. He should go back to protecting people from their 32oz big gulp and leave the firearms to the adults.

    • Jared

      Hypocrisy is the case with most authoritarians. They would strip all our liberties in the guise of safety and security. Whether it be food or firearms, drinks or drugs, tits or tilt-a-whirls, it isn't about those things, it's about power and modeling people into their perception of what should be.

      Live Free or Die.

  • PACEPALMMORONS

    This is the man that has been trying to abolish guns in NYC, who has seen an increase in violent crime, a police officer has been found stealing guns becuase they have gotten harder to obtain. What is needed is tougher enforcement of exsiting laws. People shouldnt be allowed to get away with not reporting lost or stolen guns like they can now, people kill people dont blame the tools they choose to do it with.

  • Bob Stevens

    I live near one of the Richmond, Virginia gun stores that Bloomberg had the temerity to sue a few years ago. I've made a point of supporting that store with my dollars ever since. Every time I read the latest anti-gun Bloomberg blather, I purchase something extra from that store, whether it be a high-cap magazine or a box of ammo. I can see that I'll be needing to budget a little more in that department if Bloomberg keeps erupting. The question right now is what should I buy in response to today's tirade?

  • Heretic

    The answer to violent crime is easy. Mandatory firearm possession. If you are 21 and over, you cannot leave your property without being in possession of a firearm. Failure to comply would be a $1000 fine. Watch the crime rate plummet. Then we wouldn't have to waste all those taxpayer dollars employing police to abuse us.

    • Fedun

      Here is an even better idea. At the age of 21 all males go to jail for 20 years and Be forced to study the constitution of the NRA and upon release vote for the republican party only. Watch crime drop.

  • Smokey

    This country is just off the damn chain!!! I guess there is no longer a constitution or bill of rights. No longer do states have soverign immunity from the encroachment of federal laws that all these politicians pass every year. The next war this country will probably see is "Citizens vs. Federal Govt." Will the politicians try to sick the military on us? I think not, because all of the military personnel have civilian families that have and will own gun for generations. They are not going to take orders to disarm their families. Common sense would tell a politician that this issue is a political doo msday for them. Oh, so sorry, they have no common sense!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • keith

      i agree with you my fiend.they will not us us military against us. that is why they will employ foreign NATO type troops to attack us.last time that happened,somebody got their ass kicked.i refer to july the 4th .it can happen again too.

  • Guest

    As a police officer I would have to say criminals will always be able to obtain a firearm. They are not going to go to a local gun shop and by a gun. If they have money or drugs to trade for a gun they will be able to get one.
    If anything make it easier for a law abiding citizen to obtain a firearm. Perhaps if someone in the movie theater was armed they could have at least attempted to defend themselves and the other patrons. If more people legally carried a firearm these criminals would at least need to consider someone they are about to attack might just fight back.

  • BigTex

    Hey with 30000 gun deaths a year what does it take to wake you up to the advantages of reasonable gun control. Wake up America and stop allowing the NRA to make your decisions for you. Hell, a couple planes take-out two building and kill 3000 and you regulate everybody and everything to death – just whisper the word 'security' in the good old United Frightened States of America and the amount offset , useless security and regulations you will accept are limitless. Yet kill 30000 a year by guns and te notion of strict limits on where you can use, who can use etc sends you into catatonic state.

    Wasn't so long ago that even the NRA believed in reasonable controls. Guess that must stand I the way of gun sales and profits….

    • Bob Stevens

      Misc thoughts in reply, in no particular order:
      1) The NRA doesn't make decisions for us. It speaks for us as its members.
      2) The problem with homicide by gun is not the guns, it's the hearts of those who pull the trigger. This is the real battleground.
      3) No one disagrees that limits on where you can use a gun are appropriate and that the government plays a legitimate role in prescribing those boundaries.
      4) Hyperbole and superlatives in a post are NEVER appropriate. ;-)
      5) I suspect that many of us agree that a host of post 9/11 regulations are over-the-top, particularly as they pertain to the TSA and the senseless encroachment of diversity politics in identifying and eliminating real threats.
      6) When you consider that the inalienable right to keep and bear arms serves as a last line of defense against tyranny, there is little by way of gun control that's reasonable other than to prescribe or proscribe the use of arms in a civil society and to punish those who run amok.

    • Heretic

      I would suggest that if you dislike guns so much, you should leave my country and move to a country that does not suffer from an excess of liberty. It shouldn't be hard to find one, they're everywhere. Perhaps North Korea would be more to your liking.

    • Mack Missiletoe

      You anti-gun people are the ones who are scared. The 1911 has been around for over 100 years and we've all been fine.

      Take a gun safety course and learn how to shoot. Next time a few robbers enter your home you will be ready when they make it your way.

      We don't need a reason to own guns anyways! We are free. This is America. If we want to buy a gun and shoot at the range nothing is stopping us unless we have a record or are mentally unstable for example.

  • TONY OWENSBY

    YOU DON'T LIKE GUNS? WHO ARE YOU GOING TO CALL ON WHEN YOU NEED HELP BUT QUICK? A COP, MAYBE YOU'LL WAIT FOR THE BATF & BOOM TO COME TO YOUR RESCUE.. SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST IDIOT'S, OTHER JUST DON'T KNOW ANY BETTER… YOU MUCT BE A MUSLIM HERE COLLECTING OUR SOCIAL SECURITY MONEY AREN'T YOU, WAS YOU BORN IN AFRICA LIKE BARACK OBAMA? HUH HUH HUH.. YOUR DAMN SURE NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.

  • tom satery

    ALL OF YOU WAKE-UP. Frrget all of your long winded BS. All that is needed is the FACT that in ALL states that have concealed carry VIOLENT CRIME HAS DROPPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN Wyoming, where no permit is needed,violent crime is almost non-existant!!! Another example is Florida. When the old pharts from the NE went there for the winter& rented a car, they were jacked because the bad guys knew they didn't have guns because of the car's plates. When Fla. started recip. permits,the bad guys started getting dead and the jacks mostly stopped!!!!!! Ask Bloomberg & Christy the Ill. gov. how their laws are working. Then,after listening to their lies about how good gun controll is in preventing crime, come on out to WY,MONT,AZ &NV. & see how it is when the average citizen can carry. Bad guys get hurt here so they go to NJ,NY,MASS,CA. where the laws protect them– even after they get busted–if they ever do.

    • Heretic

      Excellent points.

  • Jonathon W

    Of the 30,000 deaths per year "caused by firearms" how many were in self defense or defense of one's family? Regulate/ban all you want; if someone breaks into my house at 3:00 AM there will be some type of firearm (even if that be a homebrew) waiting to greet them. My family is irreplaceable and if someone thinks they can/should put them in danger they deserve every bit of metal I will throw their way. Hand every homeowner in the United States an M1911A1 and see how many wackos continue on robbing/raping/killing.

    How many of those 30,000 deaths were suicides? People don't need a firearm to accomplish taking their own life, just like they don't need one to kill another person. I feel like people take the biggest number they can find on a topic and use it to their advantage. Arm your anti-gun argument more accurately with (insert number here) people were killed in the U.S. last year due to firearm ACCIDENTS and you might see the other side of the argument to make more sense. People are going to kill themselves, and people are going to kill other people; firearms are not the issue.

  • GARY

    THIS WHACK JOB SHOULD SPEND MORE OF HIS TIME OUTLAWING THE LARGE SODA CANS, POPCORN, AND OTHER ITEMS LIKE CANDY BARS. THEY LIKELY KILL MORE PEOPLE THAN GUNS. BLAMING GUNS FOR COLORADO DEATHS IS LIKE BLAMING THE PLANES FOR 9/11. LOSERS NEED TO GET A LIFE. MOST WHACK JOBS ARE IN CALIF AND NEW YORK, NOT ALL, BUT MOST.

  • bryan

    poeple will always be psyco you cant control that, making it hard to get a gun wont stop anything. i dont mean to be cold but shooting victims are lucky a simple mixture of houshold chemicals and we would have very differnt outcomes. timothy mcveigh did a lot more with unregulated fertilizer and desil fule than anyone with any assult weapon ever.

  • Gray

    The man who has confessed to dozens of felony straw purchases, but has yet to be arrested, wants more gun control? What a hypocrite.

    • keith

      yeah,maybe he is related to Eric Holder,he did the same thing !LOL

  • keith

    WHAT AN IDITO! IF THE COPS GO ON STRIKE THEN IT IS US,THE ONES HE COMPLAINS ABOUT,THAT WILL HAVE TO PROTECT THIS DOUCHE BAG

  • Mack Missiletoe

    Shooters target gun free zones. Let's put a stop to that.

    I wonder if Bloomberg is the same guy watering his 15,000 acre yard during a water ban due to no rain. With armed Security on his property he says, "Outlaw guns because I am scared someone is going to take my money."

    Maybe you aught to think about your citizens and countrymen who have no way of defending themselves when a bad guy enters their home.

    In addition any guns confiscated by Police could be sold to other states for profit. I could think of a whole lotta reasons why this guy would not want us armed. It benefits him and no one else.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jbairddo Jeff Baird

    How about this guy makes a promise that gun control will work so well, that if anyone is victimized in anyway by a gun after implementation he will pay each victim a $1million. We he still be so sure it is worthwhile?

  • http://www.facebook.com/scott.ostrander1 Scott Ostrander

    Heres the 1%. And you thought is was all the business people that had the money

  • http://twitter.com/judithalamance @judithalamance

    AMERICANS should strike – against New York City's economy – by boycotting its vital tourism and convention sector until Bloomberg is gone. Make the donors and voters keeping him in office pay for it.